Thursday, January 22, 2009

An introduction to PR

I think two key points to remember from this week's readings were:
  1. The democratization of communications is quickly redefining how public relations is used
  2. PR is a science, an art and a business
The readings made me think more about public relations theory/practice in that:

In the past, communicating with a mass audience was available only to corporations which had enough resources to afford to incur massive fees in pushing their messages through media channels required. In this corporate context, public relations was often said to "faciliate relationships and understanding between and organization and its publics" (McElreath in Johnston & Zawari, 2009).

However, the arrival and availability of affordable media recording and production tools and the Internet has resulted in the democratization of communications. Today, anyone with access to a mobile phone with built-in camera and the Internet is able to put out messages to a large audience.

Acknowledging this changed communication landscape, where messages are no longer propagated by organizations but can also be created and spread by its publics, Johnston and Zawari (2009) redefined PR as "the development and management of ethical strategies
using communications to build relationships with stakeholders or publics".

In order to develop and build relationships with its stakeholders (who always take an active interest in an organization or its actions) or its publics (who can be either active or passive in its interactions with an organization), the PR practitioner must be:
  1. Systematic in constructing models and frameworks by which the audience can be understood (Science)
  2. Creative in coming up with new and fresh ways of communicating with audiences (Art)
  3. Prudent in achieving and creating the best possible value and end result with limited resources (Business)
Practicing PR requires the combination and synthesis of many disciplines.

This post refers to the readings for Week 2 -- Chapters 1, 2 &3.

1 comment:

  1. I'm kind of confused with the unrevised quote that PR "facilitate relationships and understanding between organization and its publics" (McElreath in Johnston & Zawari, 2009), because that just implies that PR is merely a tool for a company to communicate with their audience. It doesn't sound derogatory in any way as well. It's hard to link that definition with the past, in which you said "communicating with the mass audience was available to corporations which had enough resources to afford...", not to mention that PR practitioners are often labeled as 'spin doctors'.

    Other than that, it's a nice touch to encapsule (lulz not a real word) PR as a combination of many other disciplines. Which on second thought, doesn't sound like something you can just encapsulate (this is a real word) due to how dense and complicated practicing PR actually is. And I never would have thought PR as Science, much less being categorized as subjects.

    ReplyDelete